Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters

Database
Main subject
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Regen Med ; 17(2): 81-90, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1581477

ABSTRACT

Aim: To attend stem cell (SC) seminars hosted by US-based direct-to-consumer SC businesses either in person or via online 'webinars' to determine accuracy and regulatory oversight of the advertised SC therapies. Methods: The therapeutic claims, costs, risks, scientific evidence in support of a therapy and any regulatory oversight were collated using pre-established checklists. Participation consisted of one live attendance of a seminar, and following COVID-19 restrictions, review of seven recorded presentations available on the internet from SC businesses. Results & conclusion: None of the SC therapies advertised by direct-to-consumer clinics reviewed were supported by proper clinical evidence nor substantiated by peer reviewed literature.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Advertising , Humans , Internet , SARS-CoV-2 , Stem Cell Transplantation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL